PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
CCR5 and HIV Infection
January 2015
Drug Targets: Bile Acids in Motion
September 2014
Drug Targets: S1R's Ligands and Partners
September 2014
P2Y Receptors and Blood Clotting
September 2014
Bacterial CDI Toxins
June 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
March 2014
Microbial Pathogenesis: Targeting Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
February 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Cancer Networks: IFI16-mediated p53 Activation
November 2013
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Finding Druggable Targets
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Infectious Diseases: Determining the Essential Structome
May 2013
NDM-1 and Antibiotics
May 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Computational Epitope Prediction
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Influenza Inhibitor Screen
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Measles Virus Attachment
January 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Receptor bias
July 2012
Anthrax Stealth Siderophores
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
Superbugs and Antibiotic Resistance
December 2011
Terminal activation
December 2011
A change to resistance
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Breaking down the defenses
September 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Peptidoglycan binding: Calcium-free killing
June 2010
Treating sleeping sickness
May 2010
Bacterial spore kinase
April 2010
Antibiotics and Ribosome Function
March 2010
Safer Alzheimer's drugs?
March 2010
Anthrax evasion tactics
September 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Antibiotic target
August 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
July 2009
Tackling influenza
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Anthrax stealth molecule
March 2009
Drug targets to aim for
February 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Drug discovery

Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.165]
Technical Highlight - October 2013
Short description: A new automated algorithm uses X-ray data to identify dynamic contact networks involved in enzyme catalysis.

Conformational exchange in cyclophilin A. Six contact networks comprising 29% of residues are mapped on the three-dimensional structure of CYPA. 1

Most enzymes fluctuate between different conformations in order to accomplish their function, and catalytic or regulatory mechanisms often involve long range motions. Although X-ray crystallography offers high-resolution views of proteins in alternate conformations, single or even multiple structures may not provide detailed information on the precise nature of allosteric communication between distant sites.

In an effort to harvest functional dynamics information from X-ray data, van den Bedem (PSI JCSG), Fraser and colleagues have now developed a new algorithm: contact networks through alternate conformation transitions (CONTACT). To identify interaction networks, qFit—an algorithm previously developed to extract conformational heterogeneity from X-ray diffraction data—is first used to define possible alternative conformations. CONTACT then uses this information to calculate the van der Waals interactions across all alternative conformations in order to define those likely to propagate to other residues. The identification of contact networks and analysis of their behavior when perturbed can provide insight into how conformational dynamics underlies enzyme catalysis.

As a validation test for CONTACT, the authors looked at two enzymes known to undergo significant conformational exchanges during catalysis: cyclophilin A (CYPA) and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). CONTACT identified multiple plausible transition pathways to known end states of CYPA, in line with recent NMR studies. To study long-range perturbation in DHFR, the authors obtained high-resolution X-ray diffraction datasets for wild-type DHFR at both cryogenic and room temperatures (PDB 4KJJ and 4KJK, respectively). They identified a contact network that connects the dynamic FG loop, the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP)-binding pocket and the adenosine-binding domain of DHFR. CONTACT predicted that removal of NADP would disrupt coupling between the FG loop and adenosine-binding domain, a prediction experimentally confirmed by NMR analysis of DHFR containing the G121V mutation located within the FG loop. Similar analyses of another catalytically-defective DHFR mutant (PDB 3QL3 and 4KJL) unexpectedly revealed an expanded contact network resulting in non-productive motion around the active site and loss of catalytic efficiency.

This work demonstrates that X-ray data obtained at room temperature reveal accessible alternative conformations that are not observed at cryogenic temperatures. The development of methods allowing the collection of high-quality X-ray data at temperatures above the glass transition will therefore facilitate the predictions of allosteric pathways to their full extent. CONTACT should be a useful tool to complement the current arsenal of methods aimed at deciphering protein conformational dynamics.

Stéphane Larochelle


  1. H. van den Bedem et al. Automated identification of functional dynamic contact networks from X-ray crystallography.
    Nat Methods. 10, 896-902 (2013). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2592

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health